Professional Opinion

If the horse could choose whether to allow us to ride on its back or not I am certain that he would let us walk instead. As we are unable to ask him in a manner he would understand we are obliged to ride him in a way that causes the least stress, pain or fear: We are obliged to learn a method of communication that is based on a mutual understanding and allows the horse to retain its dignity and natural character.

I believe that we must use a channel of communication based on body language and voice with minimum use of direct pressure or coercion.

I believe that the association of pressure is enough to provide the horse with a light cue signaling the rider's request and allowing it to respond without refusal.

I believe that the equestrian pyramid that at its base differentiates between English or Western riders, English or Western trainers and English or Western instructors is a dangerous one, and is indeed upside down. This situation which exists today bases itself on an inherent lack of knowledge seen by riding instructors as irrelevant to their specific field. The tragic result of this pyramid is that beginners automatically learn only one style of riding, either Western or English, pushing aside the basic training skills essential to understanding the horse and basic riding skills essential to ensuring safety both on the ground and whilst riding.

I believe that the correct pyramid is built with a wide base including the basics for horse, rider, and trainer using elements from both styles for example body language, sitting position, rein contact and universal codes for going forward, trotting, cantering and speed control.